Who the desk is
It is the editorial team of the company that also runs OXpeptides. The site does not publish personal bylines, so every article carries the same signature and links here. It is not a medical team. Its pages are checked against their sources, not signed off by a clinician, and nothing on the site is medical advice. CJC-1295 and ipamorelin are investigational compounds, approved by neither the FDA nor the EMA.
What it reads
Its sources are the primary literature, not other websites. For CJC-1295 that means the ConjuChem chemistry paper of 2005 and the two trials in the Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism in 2006. For ipamorelin it means the Novo Nordisk paper of 1998, the pharmacokinetic study of 1999 and the phase 2 trials registered by Helsinn. For the idea of pairing the two, it means the 1990 study by Bowers and colleagues. Abstracts are read on PubMed and trial records through the ClinicalTrials.gov API. Clinic pages, forums, supplier pages and encyclopedias are never cited as evidence.
How it checks a number
Before a page goes live, each DOI is requested from the CrossRef API and each trial number from the ClinicalTrials.gov API. A reference that does not answer with HTTP 200 is dropped. Today the site cites 34 sources, 26 with a DOI and 5 with a registry number. Figures are quoted in the units the authors used, with the population and the duration they apply to. The desk publishes no doses, no protocols, no testimonials and no reviews. All nine rules are set out in the editorial policy.
Who pays for it, and the link to OXpeptides
The publisher of this site also runs OXpeptides, a supplier of research peptides sold for research use only. The product link on each page goes to the CJC-1295 / ipamorelin blend at oxpeptides.com, sold by that same company. This is a conflict of interest, and the site states it on every page instead of hiding it. The main article lists the checks a buyer can make on any listing, so a reader does not have to trust the desk. The site carries no advertising and no analytics.
Articles signed by the desk
- CJC-1295 ipamorelin: what the studies show (2026)Updated 23 Sep 2026
- CJC-1295 DAC vs no DAC (2026)Updated 11 Oct 2026
- Sermorelin vs CJC-1295 ipamorelin (2026)Updated 11 Oct 2026
- CJC-1295 peptide: from a ConjuChem bench to two human trialsUpdated 11 Oct 2026
- Tesamorelin ipamorelin vs CJC-1295 ipamorelin (2026)Updated 11 Oct 2026
- CJC-1295 ipamorelin on Reddit: the seven questions that keep coming backUpdated 11 Oct 2026
- CJC-1295 side effects: the human record (2026)Updated 11 Oct 2026
The desk also keeps 2 shorter guides that are not listed in search engines for now, so they are not linked from this page.
Contact and corrections
Write to contact@cjc-1295-ipamorelin.com. A correction is made on the page where the error sits, the updated date changes, and a note goes at the foot of the page when a figure changes. A message that cites a DOI or an NCT number is answered first. More on the method is on the about page.
Informational content, not medical advice. CJC-1295 and ipamorelin are investigational research compounds, not approved by the FDA or the EMA for any use, sold for research use only, not for human or veterinary use.
